data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c951/9c9514fa5b2b5e978b12872fb698203ebf6d81fa" alt="Photo of Bryan Lammon"
Appellate jurisdiction is the first question in every appeal. Sometimes it’s the dispositive question. And it's a notoriously messy area of law. When lawyers encounter an appellate-jurisdiction issue—whether it's their first or fiftieth—they would often benefit from a little help.
That's where we come in.
Final Decisions PLLC is an appellate boutique and consultancy that focuses on federal appellate jurisdiction. We partner with lawyers facing appellate-jurisdiction issues, working together to succeed on appeal. Whether serving as consultants or co-counsel, Final Decisions PLLC is an invaluable member of an appellate team.
The Firm
Our firm has knowledge and experience that cannot be found elsewhere. We combine this background with sound appellate strategy, comprehensive research, insightful analysis, and persuasive advocacy.
Learn more about Final Decisions PLLCBryan Lammon
Final Decisions PLLC was founded by Bryan Lammon, an appellate lawyer and law professor who has spent his career studying the jurisdiction of federal appellate courts.
Learn more about Bryan LammonFinal Decisions PLLC offers a range of specialized services designed to assist clients with complex jurisdictional issues and achieve winning results on appeal.
Exhaustive Research, Insightful Analysis
We come to every case with an unparalleled background in the law of appellate jurisdiction. But that is only the starting point. We add comprehensive research and thorough analysis to find the best possible path to your desired outcome.
Consulting
We advise lawyers who prefer to handle their own briefing and argument. In these instances, our work provide provides the foundation that lawyers need to craft the best arguments for their clients.
Counsel
We stand ready to join litigation teams as co-counsel. In these cases, we use our experience in appellate advocacy to transform our research and analysis into clear, concise, and convincing arguments in both written briefs and at oral argument.
“The court needs—more, is entitled to—the scrupulous assistance of the bar in determining jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is the first question in every appeal. The appellant must investigate jurisdictional factors before appealing and explain those factors fully to the court.”
Blog
The Final Decisions Blog covers decisions and developments in the world of federal appellate jurisdiction.
Mandatory Stays & Remand Appeals
In City of Martinsville v. Express Scripts, Inc., a divided Fourth Circuit held that a court must stay proceedings—and not process a remand order—if the defendant appeals before the district court can send the remand order to the state court. The majority thought that the rule of Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.—particularly as the […]
Continue reading....Perlman Appeals in the Grand Jury Context
Perlman Appeals in the Grand Jury Context In In re Grand Jury Subpoeans Dated Sep. 13, 2023, the Second Circuit held that the target of a grand jury investigation could appeal an order directing the target’s attorneys to disclose documents over a claim of attorney-client privilege. The order was appealable via the Perlman doctrine, which generally […]
Continue reading....One More Rejection of Pure Bivens Appeals
In Fleming v. United States, the Eleventh Circuit became the fifth court of appeals to reject pure Bivens appeals. The court held that federal officials cannot immediately appeal the Bivens question without also appealing the denial of qualified immunity. Unlike some of the prior decisions, this one was unanimous. And it puts the government’s record […]
Continue reading....The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: January 2025
Last month produced decisions involving a variety of appellate-jurisdiction issues. The Fifth Circuit decertified a § 1292(b) appeal. Judge Pillard of the D.C. Circuit explained that appellate “standing” does not require re-establishing standing in the court of appeals. The Sixth Circuit said that qualified immunity and an action’s merits are intertwined, which suggests (perhaps unintentionally) […]
Continue reading....New Cert Petition on Derivative Sovereign Immunity Appeals
A new cert petition asks whether the denial of derivative sovereign immunity is immediately appealable via the collateral-order doctrine.
Continue reading....Cert Grant on Post-Reopening Notices of Appeal
Disclosure: I filed an amicus brief in the Fourth Circuit in support of rehearing its decision in this case and discussed the cert petition with the petitioner’s counsel. Last week, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Parrish v. United States. The case asks if a would-be appellant must file a second notice of appeal after […]
Continue reading....Research
Final Decisions’ principal and founder Bryan Lammon has been studying appellate jurisdiction for over a decade. He has published articles on a variety of topics in this area, and his work has been cited by numerous appellate courts.
Recent Publications
- There Is No Helpful General Rule About Appealing Dismissals Without Prejudice, 123 Michigan Law Review Online 16 (2024).
- Manufactured Finality, 69 Villanova Law Review 271 (2024).
- Final Decisions & Final Judgments, 24 Journal of Appellate Practice & Process 58 (2024).
- Voluntary Dismissals, Jurisdiction & Waiving Appellate Review, 92 University of Cincinnati Law Review, 92 University of Cincinnati Law Review 394 (2023).
- Reforming Qualified-Immunity Appeals, 87 Missouri Law Review 1137 (2022)
Recent Citations
- Jones v. MSPB, 103 F.4th 984 (4th Cir. 2024) (citing Manufactured Finality).
- New York State Telecommunications Association v. James, 101 F.4th 135 (2d Cir. 2024), 2024 WL 1814541 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2024) (Sullivan, J., dissenting) (citing Manufactured Finality and Voluntary Dismissals, Jurisdiction & Waiving Appellate Review).
- Mohammed v. Jones, 100 F.4th 1214 (10th Cir. 2024) (citing Finality, Appealability, and the Scope of Interlocutory Review).
- Ingram v. Wayne County, 81 F.4th 603 (6th Cir. 2023) (citing Finality, Appealability, and the Scope of Interlocutory Review).
- Harris v. Clay County, 47 F.4th 271 (5th Cir. 2022) (citing Municipal Piggybacking in Qualified-Immunity Appeals).
“As in every case, the first question we must resolve is our jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.”
- West v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co., 951 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2020)