Reviewing hardship determinations in immigration appeals, reconsidering motions-panel decisions, church-autonomy appeals, CAFA remands, pendent appellate jurisdiction in Rule 23(f) appeals, and much more.


March was a busy month. Let’s start with the Supreme Court’s decision holding that appellate courts had jurisdiction to review hardship determinations in immigration appeals.

Continue Reading


Some questions about the collateral-order doctrine. Plus hindsight regarding the appeal deadline, admiralty appeals, and much more.


Decisions from last month raised some interesting questions about the role of the collateral-order doctrine, particularly when it comes to immunities and criminal appeals. In other developments, the Eleventh Circuit deemed an appeal untimely after concluding that—in hindsight—a post-judgment motion was not really a Rule 59 motion. The Ninth Circuit split on what it means to determine “rights and liabilities” for purposes of admiralty appeals. And the Fifth Circuit heard another governmental-privilege appeal. Plus appeals from reinstated removal orders, improper qualified-immunity appeals, and more.

Continue Reading


Appeals involving an abandoned claim/amended complaint, denials of qualified immunity, sealing orders, administrative remands, PREP Act immunity, and more.


An especially busy January means I didn’t have a lot of time to post about decisions from last month. But there were still several worth talking about. Below is a brief roundup of what I found interesting.

Continue Reading


A notice of appeal’s multiple functions, sanctions of unspecified attorney fees, and more.


The last month of 2023 produced several decisions of note. Two courts addressed whether a single filing could serve the dual functions of both a motion to reopen the appeal deadline and a notice of appeal. The courts of appeals have split on this issue, though both courts to address it last month held that a single notice of appeal could perform these multiple functions. Plus decisions on the finality of a sanction of unspecified attorney fees, a gag-order appeal in a criminal case, arbitration appeals involving substitute arbitrators, and more.

Continue Reading


November saw further cut backs on Perlman appeals, a purported video-evidence exception for qualified-immunity appeals, a partial objection to an untimely criminal appeal, and more.


Last month’s major appellate-jurisdiction development involved another court narrowing the availability of Perlman appeals. In other decisions, the Fifth Circuit carved a new, video-evidence exception to the scope of qualified-immunity appeals. The Third Circuit addressed what to do with a partial objection to an untimely criminal appeal. The Ninth Circuit applied Dupree to part of a summary-judgment denial. And a Fourth Circuit panel stuck by the rule that the 30-day deadline for immigration appeals is jurisdictional, though a concurrence doubted that rule’s soundness. Plus an improper qualified-immunity appeal and two decisions on the scope of interlocutory appeals.

Continue Reading


Abandoning claims to create finality, appealing PREP Act-immunity denials, Rule 54(b) partial judgments for counts and claims, and more.


Last month produced a wide variety of appellate-jurisdiction decisions. The Eleventh Circuit issued more opinions on whether and when claimants can voluntarily dismiss (or, in one case, “abandon”) claims to create a final decision. The Ninth Circuit held that defendants can appeal from the denial of PREP Act immunity. And the Eleventh Circuit addressed the meaning of claims (versus counts) in the context of Rule 54(b). Plus reviewing the summary-judgment standard in qualified-immunity appeals, the jurisdictionality of Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii), and much more—including a new cert petition on whether federal defendants can take pure Bivens appeals.

Continue Reading


More Rule 3(c) drama, manufactured finality in bankruptcy, discovery appeals involving Speech-or-Debate Clause immunity, and more.


September saw more drama over Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c), as the Eleventh Circuit appeared to use Rule 3(c)(6) to revive the old practice of limiting the scope of an appeal to the designated order. The courts of appeals also addressed manufactured finality in the bankruptcy context, a discovery appeal implicating the Speech or Debate Clause, and the appealability of decisions on substituting counsel. Plus more judges questioning the appealability of anti-SLAPP motions, addressing preclusion as part of a qualified-immunity appeal, and a new cert petition on manufactured finality.

Continue Reading


The scope of § 1292(b) appeals, manufactured finality from a summary-judgment denial, another duty-to-defend appeal, and more.


I spent most of August busy or sick or both. So there weren’t many posts about decisions. But the month was still full of interesting developments.

Continue Reading


Lots of class-certification appeals, pendent appellate jurisdiction, and duty-to-defend appeals. Plus appeals from compassionate-release grants, conditional dismissals, and qualified-immunity denials; the requirements of Rule 4(a)(6); immigration exhaustion, and more.


July produced two opinions in Rule 23(f) appeals from class-certification decisions. One addressed whether a FLSA collective-action decision could tag along via pendent appellate jurisdiction, and the other thought that an appeal was proper due to the district court’s inadequate explanation. There were also some pendent appellate jurisdiction decisions involving sovereign immunity. And two courts held that duty-to-defend decisions were not appealable injunctions. Plus decisions on government appeals from compassionate-release grants, appeals from conditional dismissals, jurisdiction after an agreement to appeal, several improper qualified-immunity appeals, and much more.

Continue Reading


Arbitration appeals, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, appeal deadlines after bankruptcy stays, fact-based qualified-immunity appeals, and more.


June was arbitration-appeals month. In its third and last decision of the term relating to appellate jurisdiction, the Supreme Court held that district courts must stay proceedings on the merits pending an interlocutory arbitration appeal. In the courts of appeals, the Third Circuit reviewed the denial of a motion to dismiss that effectively sought arbitration. And the First Circuit dismissed an appeal from an order denying reconsideration of an arbitration denial.

In other decisions, two courts of appeals addressed some nuances of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Fourth Circuit explained what notice is required under Rule 4(a)(6). And the Fifth Circuit recognized the amendments to Rule 3(c). There were also decisions on a bankruptcy stay’s effect on the appeal deadline, fact-based qualified-immunity appeals, and the reasonableness of mistakes for Rule 4(a)(2). Plus a new cert grant, denials of cert on appealing church-autonomy defenses, and more.

Continue Reading