Appellate jurisdiction is the first question in every appeal. Sometimes it’s the dispositive question. And it's a notoriously messy area of law. When lawyers encounter an appellate-jurisdiction issue—whether it's their first or fiftieth—they would often benefit from a little help.
That's where we come in.
Final Decisions PLLC is an appellate boutique and consultancy that focuses on federal appellate jurisdiction. We partner with lawyers facing appellate-jurisdiction issues, working together to succeed on appeal. Whether serving as consultants or co-counsel, Final Decisions PLLC is an invaluable member of an appellate team.
The Firm
Our firm has knowledge and experience that cannot be found elsewhere. We combine this background with sound appellate strategy, comprehensive research, insightful analysis, and persuasive advocacy.
Learn more about Final Decisions PLLCBryan Lammon
Final Decisions PLLC was founded by Bryan Lammon, an appellate lawyer and law professor who has spent his career studying the jurisdiction of federal appellate courts.
Learn more about Bryan LammonFinal Decisions PLLC offers a range of specialized services designed to assist clients with complex jurisdictional issues and achieve winning results on appeal.
Exhaustive Research, Insightful Analysis
We come to every case with an unparalleled background in the law of appellate jurisdiction. But that is only the starting point. We add comprehensive research and thorough analysis to find the best possible path to your desired outcome.
Consulting
We advise lawyers who prefer to handle their own briefing and argument. In these instances, our work provides the foundation that lawyers need to craft the best arguments for their clients.
Counsel
We stand ready to join litigation teams as co-counsel. In these cases, we use our experience in appellate advocacy to transform our research and analysis into clear, concise, and convincing arguments in both written briefs and at oral argument.
“The court needs—more, is entitled to—the scrupulous assistance of the bar in determining jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is the first question in every appeal. The appellant must investigate jurisdictional factors before appealing and explain those factors fully to the court.”
Blog
The Final Decisions Blog covers decisions and developments in the world of federal appellate jurisdiction.
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: November 2025
This month’s roundup features two decisions on litigants’ attempts to voluntarily dismiss some of their claims. In one, a defendant filed a written, pretrial notice that it abandoned one of its counterclaims. In another, the parties stipulated to a dismissal, but one defendant did not sign the stipulation. In both cases, the court deemed the […]
Continue reading....The Appeal Clock for Successful Post- Judgment Motions
In Gessele v. Jack in the Box Inc., the Ninth Circuit held that when a district court alters its judgment by granting a post-judgment motion, the time to appeal runs from the entry of an amended judgment. Unlike orders denying post-judgment motions, the appeal clock does not start with the order itself.
Continue reading....No Finality by Abandoning Claims Before Trial
In Simmons v. USI Insurance LLC, the Eleventh Circuit held that the purported abandonment of a counterclaim before trial was ineffective and thus precluded appellate jurisdiction. The counterclaim was the only theory of relief that had not been resolved at summary judgment or trial. And in a written notice before trial, the defendant had said […]
Continue reading....The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: October 2025
September’s biggest development in federal appellate jurisdiction concerned appeals from denials of anti-SLAPP motions under California law. The Ninth Circuit overruled its longstanding rule that defendants can immediately appeal from these denials via the collateral-order doctrine. But only a week later, the Federal Circuit followed that now-overruled caselaw and heard an anti-SLAPP appeal. It will […]
Continue reading....The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: September 2025
Last month saw the Ninth Circuit apply its rule that a minute order can count as a separate document for purposes of starting the appeal clock. The Sixth Circuit explained when it cannot review contract-formation issues in an arbitration appeal. And the Fourth Circuit declined to exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over standing and ripeness issues […]
Continue reading....The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: August 2025
Last month saw a new circuit split on the deadline for appealing qualified-immunity denials. The Ninth Circuit held that the apeal clock starts with the entry of the order denying qualified immunity, not with any subsequent entry of a judgment. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit split with the Fifth, which has held that the […]
Continue reading....Research
Final Decisions’ principal and founder Bryan Lammon has been studying appellate jurisdiction for over a decade. He has published articles on a variety of topics in this area, and his work has been cited by numerous appellate courts.
Recent Publications
- There Is No Helpful General Rule About Appealing Dismissals Without Prejudice, 123 Michigan Law Review Online 16 (2024).
- Manufactured Finality, 69 Villanova Law Review 271 (2024).
- Final Decisions & Final Judgments, 24 Journal of Appellate Practice & Process 58 (2024).
- Voluntary Dismissals, Jurisdiction & Waiving Appellate Review, 92 University of Cincinnati Law Review, 92 University of Cincinnati Law Review 394 (2023).
- Reforming Qualified-Immunity Appeals, 87 Missouri Law Review 1137 (2022)
Recent Citations
- Jones v. MSPB, 103 F.4th 984 (4th Cir. 2024) (citing Manufactured Finality).
- New York State Telecommunications Association v. James, 101 F.4th 135 (2d Cir. 2024), 2024 WL 1814541 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2024) (Sullivan, J., dissenting) (citing Manufactured Finality and Voluntary Dismissals, Jurisdiction & Waiving Appellate Review).
- Mohammed v. Jones, 100 F.4th 1214 (10th Cir. 2024) (citing Finality, Appealability, and the Scope of Interlocutory Review).
- Ingram v. Wayne County, 81 F.4th 603 (6th Cir. 2023) (citing Finality, Appealability, and the Scope of Interlocutory Review).
- Harris v. Clay County, 47 F.4th 271 (5th Cir. 2022) (citing Municipal Piggybacking in Qualified-Immunity Appeals).
“As in every case, the first question we must resolve is our jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.”
- West v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co., 951 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2020)