Posts in category “Weekly Roundup”
Last week, the D.C. Circuit addressed finality and appealability in the military-commission context. The Fourth Circuit reminded everyone that Rule 54(b) partial judgments need to include that rule’s magic words (and an explanation). Plus appeals involving anti-SLAPP denials and challenges to the factual basis of qualified-immunity denials. Let’s start with a new cert petition on state-action antitrust immunity.…
Continue reading....Last week saw oral argument in the Supreme Court’s big appellate-jurisdiction case for this term. In other Supreme Court news, the parties finished cert-stage briefing in a case that could get rid of the Fifth Circuit’s finality trap. In the courts of appeals, the Fifth Circuit split on the permissible scope of a certified appeal under § 1292(b).…
Continue reading....Last week saw two decisions of note. The Ninth Circuit dismissed a fact-based qualified-immunity appeal, with Judge Fletcher dissenting to argue for the overruling of Johnson v. Jones. And the Third Circuit dismissed an appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss the original and superseding indictments, even though a victim of the crime served on the grand jury that returned the original indictment.…
Continue reading....Last week saw a variety of appellate-jurisdiction decisions. The Second Circuit effectively held that a denied summary-judgment motion does not preserve a purely legal issue for appeal. The Sixth Circuit weighed in on the split over jurisdiction to review hardship determinations in immigration cases. The Tenth Circuit held that a defendant could not appeal a without-prejudice denial of an anti-SLAPP motion.…
Continue reading....I took a little break from Final Decisions over the holidays. And that means an extra-large roundup to start the new year—the last two weeks of 2020 produced a plethora of interesting appellate-jurisdiction decisions.
The First Circuit addressed another attempted appeal from the denial of a temporary restraining order in a COVID-related case.…
Continue reading....This is the last weekly roundup of 2020. (I’ll be back after the new year with a post covering the two holiday weeks.) And it involves some pretty technical cases.
Two decisions—one from the Fourth Circuit and another from the Sixth—dealt with the jurisdictional impact of procedural rules. The Fourth Circuit held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is jurisdictional.…
Continue reading....Last week, the Seventh Circuit addressed finality and consolidated complaints in the shaky-cheese multidistrict litigation. The en banc Eleventh Circuit elected to re-examine its law on appealing the state-action antitrust defense. In cert-stage developments, the Supreme Court received a second petition on the scope of § 1447(d) remand appeals and a new petition on the use of mandamus in criminal cases.…
Continue reading....Last week saw several courts hold that they lacked jurisdiction over a variety of appeals. Indeed, I found only one case of note in which the court actually had appellate jurisdiction. Still, there are some interesting decisions, including an illustration of the odd “colorable” requirement for double jeopardy appeals. Let’s start with an appeal from two post-judgment orders, one timely and one not.…
Continue reading....The holiday week produced two decisions of note. In one, the Eleventh Circuit held that a judgment on the merits of a Fair Labor Standards Act claim is final despite any outstanding issues of attorneys’ fees. And the Third Circuit applied its rule that litigants can immediately appeal Rhines stays in habeas cases.…
Continue reading....Last week, a Sixth Circuit concurrence offered a new approach to finality for bankruptcy appeals. The First Circuit added denials of special motions under Maine’s anti-SLAPP law to the list of appealable collateral orders. The Eleventh Circuit told litigants that they have to accept the consequences of waiving the right to amend so that they could appeal.…
Continue reading....Final Decisions PLLC is an appellate boutique and consultancy that focuses on federal appellate jurisdiction. We partner with lawyers facing appellate-jurisdiction issues, working as consultants or co-counsel to achieve positive outcomes on appeal. Contact us to learn how we can work together.
Learn More Contact