Scholarship

New Article on Final Decisions & Final Judgments

Final decisions and final judgments play distinct roles in the law of federal appellate jurisdiction. Courts should recognize as much.

September 7, 2023

By Bryan Lammon

I have a new article on the distinct roles that final decisions and final judgments play in the law of federal appellate jurisdiction.

Final decisions and final judgments lie at the core of modern federal appellate jurisdiction. But far too often, courts and litigants conflate the two. This lack of precision can create unnecessary procedural detours and needlessly cumbersome rules of appellate jurisdiction. It can even lead to the inadvertent loss of the right to appeal. Some clarity is needed.

Using the circuit split over appeals after dismissals with leave to reinstate, I use this article to explain the separate and important roles that final decisions and final judgments play in federal appellate jurisdiction. In short, the existence of a final decision determines when appellate jurisdiction exists and thus when litigants can appeal. And the entry of a final judgment starts the appeal clock, determining the point by which litigants must appeal. These two events often coincide. But not always. Going forward, courts should be precise when discussing these two key aspects of federal appellate jurisdiction. Doing so could bring some much-needed clarity to this area of the law.

The article is titled Final Decisions & Final Judgments, and it’s forthcoming in the Journal of Appellate Practice & Process. A draft is available on SSRN.

Final Decisions & Final Judgments, 24 Journal of Appellate Practice & Process (forthcoming 2024), available at SSRN.

recent posts

No Perlman Appeals When the Same Issues Could Be Raised via Contempt
The Eleventh Circuit held that a privilege claimant cannot take a Perlman appeal when the claimant could have raised the same issues via its own contempt appeal.
A Rule 4 Conflict: The Prison-Mailbox Rule v. the Mistaken-Filing Rule
The Fifth Circuit held that when an imprisoned appellant mistakenly mails a notice of appeal to the court of appeals, the notice is deemed filed when deposited in the prison mail system.
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: September 2024
Another split on pure Bivens appeals, no equitable exceptions for Rule 4(a)(4), another failure to apply the Rule 3(c) amendments, and more.
Serving, Filing, and Equitable Exceptions to Rule 4(a)(4)
The Second Circuit reiterated its rule that a post-judgment motion must be timely filed—not merely served—to reset the appeal clock. The court added that Rule 4(a)(4) does not allow for equitable exceptions and addressed an order-designation issue, too.
Yet Another Split Rejection of Pure Bivens Appeals
The Ninth Circuit joined the Third and Tenth Circuits in rejecting pure Bivens appeals. But like those courts, the Ninth’s decision was split.

related posts

When Is an Interlocutory Order a Judgment?
Rule 54(a) defines a judgment to include “any order from which an appeal lies.” So appealable interlocutory orders are “judgments.” And when there’s no separate document, litigants can have 180 days to appeal.
A Judgment That Is Not Appealable (Or a Judgment)
Sometimes a “judgment” is not really a judgment, like when the district court has not yet issued a declaration of the parties’ rights.