Appellate Decisions

Appealing Motions to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration

The First Circuit explained that it can review the denial of a motion to dismiss when the only ground for dismissal was to compel arbitration.

March 4, 2023

By Bryan Lammon

In Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., the First Circuit reviewed what was nominally the denial of a motion to dismiss, as that motion effectively sought to compel arbitration.

Fraga arose from a purported class action seeking unpaid wages. The employer responded to the complaint with a motion titled, “Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Complaint,” which asked the district court to “dismiss Plaintiff’s claims and order her to submit her claims to arbitration on an individual basis.”

The district court treated this filing as two separate motions: one to dismiss, and one to compel arbitration. The court then denied the motion to dismiss because the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged facts satisfying an exemption from the Federal Arbitration Act. In the same order, the district court reserved ruling on arbitration until it could resolve fact issues concerning that exemption. The employer then appealed.

The First Circuit held that it had jurisdiction. 9 U.S.C. § 16(a) permits immediate appeals from many orders refusing to order arbitration. And the district court’s order—though purporting to deny only a motion to dismiss—was effectively a refusal to order arbitration. The only ground for dismissal was the arbitration agreement. The First Circuit accordingly treated the motion to dismiss as one seeking to compel arbitration. So the district court’s denial of that motion was appealable under § 16.

One additional twist to note: had the district court ordered arbitration and dismissed—rather than stayed—the action, the plaintiff would have been able to appeal under the Supreme Court’s decision in Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph.

Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., 2023 WL 2342039 (1st Cir. Mar. 3, 2023), available at the First Circuit and Westlaw

recent posts

The Administrative-Remand Rule & Cross Appeals
The Ninth Circuit pointed out that if the administrative-remand rule makes an order final, everyone—not just the government—can appeal.
Post-Judgment Motions & the Appeal Clock for Interlocutory Orders
The Fourth Circuit held that a motion to reconsider an order reset the time to appeal, even though the order was interlocutory and the motion didn’t cite Rule 59(e).
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: November 2024
Resetting the appeal clock, dismissals after ordering arbitration, successive injunctions, and more.
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: October 2024
A wide variety of discovery appeals. Plus the prison-mailbox/mistaken-filing rule, appealing the Yearsley doctrine, and more.
Finality in § 1782 Proceedings
The Ninth Circuit held that a discovery order under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 was not appealable until the district court resolved any objections to the discovery request.

related posts

An Unnecessary Discourse on Reviewing Personal Jurisdiction in Arbitration Appeals
The Fifth Circuits said that it could review a personal-jurisdiction defense as part of an arbitration appeal. But it didn't need to.
The End of Arbitration + Dismissal Appeals?
The Supreme Court held that a district court cannot dismiss an action instead of issuing a stay when the district court orders arbitration a party requests a stay.
Appealable Orders, Not Appealable Documents
Just because the entirety of an “order” is appealable does not mean that other orders in the same document are appealable, too.
Coinbase Holds that § 16 Appeals Require a Stay
The Supreme Court held that the filing of a § 16 appeal from the denial of arbitration requires staying district court proceedings.
Manufactured Finality in Arbitration Appeals
The Ninth Circuit held that plaintiffs can no longer voluntarily dismiss their claims and manufacture finality after a district court orders arbitration.