Appellate Decisions

Appealing Motions to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration

The First Circuit explained that it can review the denial of a motion to dismiss when the only ground for dismissal was to compel arbitration.

March 4, 2023

By Bryan Lammon

In Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., the First Circuit reviewed what was nominally the denial of a motion to dismiss, as that motion effectively sought to compel arbitration.

Fraga arose from a purported class action seeking unpaid wages. The employer responded to the complaint with a motion titled, “Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Complaint,” which asked the district court to “dismiss Plaintiff’s claims and order her to submit her claims to arbitration on an individual basis.”

The district court treated this filing as two separate motions: one to dismiss, and one to compel arbitration. The court then denied the motion to dismiss because the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged facts satisfying an exemption from the Federal Arbitration Act. In the same order, the district court reserved ruling on arbitration until it could resolve fact issues concerning that exemption. The employer then appealed.

The First Circuit held that it had jurisdiction. 9 U.S.C. § 16(a) permits immediate appeals from many orders refusing to order arbitration. And the district court’s order—though purporting to deny only a motion to dismiss—was effectively a refusal to order arbitration. The only ground for dismissal was the arbitration agreement. The First Circuit accordingly treated the motion to dismiss as one seeking to compel arbitration. So the district court’s denial of that motion was appealable under § 16.

One additional twist to note: had the district court ordered arbitration and dismissed—rather than stayed—the action, the plaintiff would have been able to appeal under the Supreme Court’s decision in Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph.

Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., 2023 WL 2342039 (1st Cir. Mar. 3, 2023), available at the First Circuit and Westlaw

recent posts

No Perlman Appeals When the Same Issues Could Be Raised via Contempt
The Eleventh Circuit held that a privilege claimant cannot take a Perlman appeal when the claimant could have raised the same issues via its own contempt appeal.
A Rule 4 Conflict: The Prison-Mailbox Rule v. the Mistaken-Filing Rule
The Fifth Circuit held that when an imprisoned appellant mistakenly mails a notice of appeal to the court of appeals, the notice is deemed filed when deposited in the prison mail system.
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: September 2024
Another split on pure Bivens appeals, no equitable exceptions for Rule 4(a)(4), another failure to apply the Rule 3(c) amendments, and more.
Serving, Filing, and Equitable Exceptions to Rule 4(a)(4)
The Second Circuit reiterated its rule that a post-judgment motion must be timely filed—not merely served—to reset the appeal clock. The court added that Rule 4(a)(4) does not allow for equitable exceptions and addressed an order-designation issue, too.
Yet Another Split Rejection of Pure Bivens Appeals
The Ninth Circuit joined the Third and Tenth Circuits in rejecting pure Bivens appeals. But like those courts, the Ninth’s decision was split.

related posts

An Unnecessary Discourse on Reviewing Personal Jurisdiction in Arbitration Appeals
The Fifth Circuits said that it could review a personal-jurisdiction defense as part of an arbitration appeal. But it didn't need to.
The End of Arbitration + Dismissal Appeals?
The Supreme Court held that a district court cannot dismiss an action instead of issuing a stay when the district court orders arbitration a party requests a stay.
Appealable Orders, Not Appealable Documents
Just because the entirety of an “order” is appealable does not mean that other orders in the same document are appealable, too.
Coinbase Holds that § 16 Appeals Require a Stay
The Supreme Court held that the filing of a § 16 appeal from the denial of arbitration requires staying district court proceedings.
Manufactured Finality in Arbitration Appeals
The Ninth Circuit held that plaintiffs can no longer voluntarily dismiss their claims and manufacture finality after a district court orders arbitration.