Appealing Motions to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration
In Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., the First Circuit reviewed what was nominally the denial of a motion to dismiss, as that motion effectively sought to compel arbitration.
Fraga arose from a purported class action seeking unpaid wages. The employer responded to the complaint with a motion titled, “Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Complaint,” which asked the district court to “dismiss Plaintiff’s claims and order her to submit her claims to arbitration on an individual basis.”
The district court treated this filing as two separate motions: one to dismiss, and one to compel arbitration. The court then denied the motion to dismiss because the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged facts satisfying an exemption from the Federal Arbitration Act. In the same order, the district court reserved ruling on arbitration until it could resolve fact issues concerning that exemption. The employer then appealed.
The First Circuit held that it had jurisdiction. 9 U.S.C. § 16(a) permits immediate appeals from many orders refusing to order arbitration. And the district court’s order—though purporting to deny only a motion to dismiss—was effectively a refusal to order arbitration. The only ground for dismissal was the arbitration agreement. The First Circuit accordingly treated the motion to dismiss as one seeking to compel arbitration. So the district court’s denial of that motion was appealable under § 16.
One additional twist to note: had the district court ordered arbitration and dismissed—rather than stayed—the action, the plaintiff would have been able to appeal under the Supreme Court’s decision in Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph.
Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., 2023 WL 2342039 (1st Cir. Mar. 3, 2023), available at the First Circuit and Westlaw
Final Decisions PLLC is an appellate boutique and consultancy that focuses on federal appellate jurisdiction. We partner with lawyers facing appellate-jurisdiction issues, working as consultants or co-counsel to achieve positive outcomes on appeal. Contact us to learn how we can work together.
Learn More ContactRelated Posts
In Ashley v. Clay County, the Fifth Circuit held that a municipal defendant could appeal a district court’s refusal to resolve an immunity defense despite the district court’s ordering arbitration.
Continue reading....
In Hines v. Stamos (no PDF currently available), the Fifth Circuit spoke at length about its jurisdiction to review a personal-jurisdiction defense as part of an arbitration appeal. But the discussion was entirely unnecessary. The district court had never ruled on the personal-jurisdiction defense, meaning that there was no order to review. And the panel […]
Continue reading....
In Smith v. Spizzirri, the Supreme Court held that district courts must stay—not dismiss—an action if the district court orders arbitration and a party requests a stay. The decision resolves a long-standing split over the ability to dismiss actions after ordering arbitration. The decision also has implications for appellate jurisdiction. As I’ve explained on this […]
Continue reading....
Courts have held that when an “order” is appealable—say, via a certified appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or an exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)’s bar on remand appeals—the entirety of the district court’s order is within the scope of appeal. So when a district court certifies an order for an immediate appeal under § 1292(b), the […]
Continue reading....
In Coinbase, Inc., v. Bielski, the Supreme Court held that district courts must stay proceedings on the merits once a party appeals from the denial of arbitration. The Court determined that 9 U.S.C. § 16—which authorizes these appeals—was enacted against Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.’s background principal that a district court loses control over all […]
Continue reading....Recent Posts
In City of Martinsville v. Express Scripts, Inc., a divided Fourth Circuit held that a court must stay proceedings—and not process a remand order—if the defendant appeals before the district court can send the remand order to the state court. The majority thought that the rule of Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.—particularly as the […]
Continue reading....
Perlman Appeals in the Grand Jury Context In In re Grand Jury Subpoeans Dated Sep. 13, 2023, the Second Circuit held that the target of a grand jury investigation could appeal an order directing the target’s attorneys to disclose documents over a claim of attorney-client privilege. The order was appealable via the Perlman doctrine, which generally […]
Continue reading....
In Fleming v. United States, the Eleventh Circuit became the fifth court of appeals to reject pure Bivens appeals. The court held that federal officials cannot immediately appeal the Bivens question without also appealing the denial of qualified immunity. Unlike some of the prior decisions, this one was unanimous. And it puts the government’s record […]
Continue reading....
Last month produced decisions involving a variety of appellate-jurisdiction issues. The Fifth Circuit decertified a § 1292(b) appeal. Judge Pillard of the D.C. Circuit explained that appellate “standing” does not require re-establishing standing in the court of appeals. The Sixth Circuit said that qualified immunity and an action’s merits are intertwined, which suggests (perhaps unintentionally) […]
Continue reading....
A new cert petition asks whether the denial of derivative sovereign immunity is immediately appealable via the collateral-order doctrine.
Continue reading....