Appealing Motions to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration
In Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., the First Circuit reviewed what was nominally the denial of a motion to dismiss, as that motion effectively sought to compel arbitration.
Fraga arose from a purported class action seeking unpaid wages. The employer responded to the complaint with a motion titled, “Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Complaint,” which asked the district court to “dismiss Plaintiff’s claims and order her to submit her claims to arbitration on an individual basis.”
The district court treated this filing as two separate motions: one to dismiss, and one to compel arbitration. The court then denied the motion to dismiss because the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged facts satisfying an exemption from the Federal Arbitration Act. In the same order, the district court reserved ruling on arbitration until it could resolve fact issues concerning that exemption. The employer then appealed.
The First Circuit held that it had jurisdiction. 9 U.S.C. § 16(a) permits immediate appeals from many orders refusing to order arbitration. And the district court’s order—though purporting to deny only a motion to dismiss—was effectively a refusal to order arbitration. The only ground for dismissal was the arbitration agreement. The First Circuit accordingly treated the motion to dismiss as one seeking to compel arbitration. So the district court’s denial of that motion was appealable under § 16.
One additional twist to note: had the district court ordered arbitration and dismissed—rather than stayed—the action, the plaintiff would have been able to appeal under the Supreme Court’s decision in Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph.
Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc., 2023 WL 2342039 (1st Cir. Mar. 3, 2023), available at the First Circuit and Westlaw
Final Decisions PLLC is an appellate boutique and consultancy that focuses on federal appellate jurisdiction. We partner with lawyers facing appellate-jurisdiction issues, working as consultants or co-counsel to achieve positive outcomes on appeal. Contact us to learn how we can work together.
Learn More ContactRelated Posts
In Ashley v. Clay County, the Fifth Circuit held that a municipal defendant could appeal a district court’s refusal to resolve an immunity defense despite the district court’s ordering arbitration.
Continue reading....
In Hines v. Stamos (no PDF currently available), the Fifth Circuit spoke at length about its jurisdiction to review a personal-jurisdiction defense as part of an arbitration appeal. But the discussion was entirely unnecessary. The district court had never ruled on the personal-jurisdiction defense, meaning that there was no order to review. And the panel […]
Continue reading....
In Smith v. Spizzirri, the Supreme Court held that district courts must stay—not dismiss—an action if the district court orders arbitration and a party requests a stay. The decision resolves a long-standing split over the ability to dismiss actions after ordering arbitration. The decision also has implications for appellate jurisdiction. As I’ve explained on this […]
Continue reading....
Courts have held that when an “order” is appealable—say, via a certified appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or an exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)’s bar on remand appeals—the entirety of the district court’s order is within the scope of appeal. So when a district court certifies an order for an immediate appeal under § 1292(b), the […]
Continue reading....
In Coinbase, Inc., v. Bielski, the Supreme Court held that district courts must stay proceedings on the merits once a party appeals from the denial of arbitration. The Court determined that 9 U.S.C. § 16—which authorizes these appeals—was enacted against Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.’s background principal that a district court loses control over all […]
Continue reading....Recent Posts
In two appeals—Clark v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government and Salter v. City of Detroit, the Sixth Circuit spoke at length about its jurisdiction to review certain Brady issues as part of qualified-immunity appeals. The cases produced a total of six opinions, several of which dove into this jurisdictional issue.
Continue reading....
In Rossy v. City of Buffalo, the Second Circuit appeared to both dismiss a qualified-immunity appeal for a lack of jurisdiction and exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over a plaintiff’s cross-appeal. This is odd. Pendent appellate jurisdiction allows normally non-appealable issues to tag along with appealable ones. But if the denial of qualified immunity was not […]
Continue reading....
I’ve frequently written about the problem of fact-based qualified-immunity appeals both on this website and in my research. I recently decided to collect some new data on how much needless delay these appeals add to civil-rights litigation. I had done something similar a few years ago when writing about the need to sanction defendants for […]
Continue reading....
Yesterday, I filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Parrish v. United States, which is currently pending before the Supreme Court. The case asks if an appellant must file a new notice of appeal after the district court reopens the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). Both the […]
Continue reading....
Last month saw another rejection of pure Bivens appeals, an analysis of Perlman appeals in the grand-jury context, and a ruling on mandatory stays during a remand appeal. Plus an odd sovereign-immunity appeal, appeals without the express resolution of all claims, and much more.
Continue reading....