Appellate Decisions

Jaludi v. Citigroup and Appeals from Orders Compelling Arbitration

A district court ordered arbitration and dismissed—rather than stayed—the underlying action. This allowed an appeal from an order compelling arbitration.

August 11, 2019

By Bryan Lammon

In Jaludi v. Citigroup, the Third Circuit heard a plaintiff’s appeal from an order compelling arbitration of all of the plaintiff’s claims. The case is another illustration of a district court dismissing—rather than staying—an action after ordering arbitration to proceed. And it’s one that circumvents the normal limits on arbitration appeals.

Jurisdiction in Jaludi

The plaintiff in Jaludi had sued Citigroup, asserting claims under RICO and Sarbanes-Oxley. The district court eventually granted ordered arbitration for both claims, holding that provisions in two employee handbooks required arbitration. The plaintiff then appealed. On appeal, the Third Circuit held that the second of the two handbooks superseded the first. And under the second handbook Sarbanes-Oxley claims were not arbitrable.

As for jurisdiction, the Third Circuit said only that it had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. This piqued my interest. The Federal Arbitration Act’s pro-arbitration approach normally allows immediate appeals from orders denying arbitration but bars appeals from orders granting it.

So I pulled the briefs. It turns out the district court dismissed the case after ordering arbitration to proceed.

I’ve questioned this practice of dismissing cases—rather than staying them—when ordering arbitration, as it might improperly circumvent the Federal Arbitration Act. District courts that order arbitration to proceed have a procedural decision to make: should they stay proceedings in that court or dismiss them? The practical result of either decision is largely the same—litigation in the district court stops while arbitration occurs. But there’s one important difference: appellate jurisdiction. The Federal Arbitration Act bars appeals from orders staying district court proceedings. But the Supreme Court has held that an order dismissing an action in favor of arbitration is final and appealable.

It seems that stays should be required, and dismissals not allowed. See this post for more thoughts on this matter.

Jaludi v. Citigroup, 2019 WL 3558978 (3d Cir. 2019), available at the Third Circuit and Westlaw.

recent posts

No Perlman Appeals When the Same Issues Could Be Raised via Contempt
The Eleventh Circuit held that a privilege claimant cannot take a Perlman appeal when the claimant could have raised the same issues via its own contempt appeal.
A Rule 4 Conflict: The Prison-Mailbox Rule v. the Mistaken-Filing Rule
The Fifth Circuit held that when an imprisoned appellant mistakenly mails a notice of appeal to the court of appeals, the notice is deemed filed when deposited in the prison mail system.
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: September 2024
Another split on pure Bivens appeals, no equitable exceptions for Rule 4(a)(4), another failure to apply the Rule 3(c) amendments, and more.
Serving, Filing, and Equitable Exceptions to Rule 4(a)(4)
The Second Circuit reiterated its rule that a post-judgment motion must be timely filed—not merely served—to reset the appeal clock. The court added that Rule 4(a)(4) does not allow for equitable exceptions and addressed an order-designation issue, too.
Yet Another Split Rejection of Pure Bivens Appeals
The Ninth Circuit joined the Third and Tenth Circuits in rejecting pure Bivens appeals. But like those courts, the Ninth’s decision was split.

related posts

An Unnecessary Discourse on Reviewing Personal Jurisdiction in Arbitration Appeals
The Fifth Circuits said that it could review a personal-jurisdiction defense as part of an arbitration appeal. But it didn't need to.
The End of Arbitration + Dismissal Appeals?
The Supreme Court held that a district court cannot dismiss an action instead of issuing a stay when the district court orders arbitration a party requests a stay.
Appealable Orders, Not Appealable Documents
Just because the entirety of an “order” is appealable does not mean that other orders in the same document are appealable, too.
Coinbase Holds that § 16 Appeals Require a Stay
The Supreme Court held that the filing of a § 16 appeal from the denial of arbitration requires staying district court proceedings.
Appealing Motions to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration
The First Circuit explained that it can review the denial of a motion to dismiss when the only ground for dismissal was to compel arbitration.