The Year in Fact-Based Qualified-Immunity Appeals: 2024
The Year in Fact-Based Qualified-Immunity Appeals: 2024
I’ve frequently written about the problem of fact-based qualified-immunity appeals both on this website and in my research. I recently decided to collect some new data on how much needless delay these appeals add to civil-rights litigation.
I had done something similar a few years ago when writing about the need to sanction defendants for taking fact-based qualified-immunity appeals. I found that in 2020, defendants took at least 44 qualified-immunity appeals in which their arguments depended in whole or in part on challenging the factual basis for the immunity denial. Those appeals took an average of 440 days to resolve.
My findings for 2024 were almost the same. Defendants took at least 43 of these appeals in that year. And those appeals took an average of 431 days to resolve.
Courts need to prevent defendants using fact-based qualified-immunity appeals to add cost and delay to civil-rights litigation. I remain convinced that the way to do so is through sanctions.
The Problem of Fact-Based Qualified-Immunity Appeals
Defendants have a right to appeal from the denial of qualified immunity. But the scope of those appeals is limited when the district court denies immunity at summary judgment. With rare exceptions, defendants appealing from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment can dispute only the materiality of any fact disputes. They cannot argue that the district court erred in concluding that fact disputes were genuine. That is, they cannot dispute the district court’s determination of what facts a reasonable jury could find.
But defendants regularly flout this limit. They appeal from the denial of immunity and argue that the district court erred in determining what a reasonable jury could find. Appellate courts eventually dismiss these improper appeals. But at that point, the damage is done. District court often stay proceedings pending the appeal, which can take months or years. These improper appeals thus add wholly unnecessary difficulty, expense, and delay to civil-rights litigation.
Some New Data
I have a assembled a little data on these fact-based qualified-immunity appeals. In a paper arguing for sanctioning qualified-immunity appeals, I identified 44 cases from 2020 in which a court of appeals rejected a defendant’s attempts to challenge the factual basis for an immunity denial. Those appeals averaged 440 days from the filing of the notice of appeal to the appellate decision.
I recently decided to update that data. For over a year, I have been listing fact-based qualified-immunity appeals in my regular appellate-jurisdiction roundups. Using those cases, I identified another year chock full of improper appeals and delayed district court proceedings.
A few notes before diving into the data:
- The cases were collected as part of my regular reading of appellate opinions for appellate-jurisdiction issues. I included any case in which a defendant’s argument at least partially (and often entirely) challenged the factual basis for a qualified-immunity denial. It’s possible that I missed some decisions, either as an oversight or because the decision never made it onto Westlaw (it happens).
- In a small change from my 2020 study, I counted the time between the docketing of the appeal and the decision rejecting the appeal. This likely under-counted the time, if only slightly. A few days can pass between the filing of a notice of appeal in a district court and the opening of the appellate docket. And proceedings in the district court might not resume until some time after the appellate decision.
- I did not check the district court dockets to see if all proceedings were stayed during the appeal, and I cannot comment on what (if anything) happened in the district court while the appeal was pending.
- Courts sometimes affirm the denial of qualified immunity when a defendant challenge the factual basis for the appeal. The proper disposition in these cases is probably a dismissal, but the difference is largely meaningless for my purposes.
So what did I find?
2024 saw 43 qualified-immunity appeals in which the defendants challenged the factual basis for the denial of qualified immunity. On average, these appeals took 431 days to resolve (a little over 14 months). I’ve collected the data in a table at the end of this post.
These numbers are nearly identical to what I found in 2020. So it looks like fact-based qualified-immunity appeals are still a problem.
The Solution: Sanctions
I have argued that the solution to the problem of fact-based qualified-immunity appeals is sanctions. The law has long been clear: defendants cannot challenge the factual basis for an immunity denial without invoking one of the rare exceptions that would allow them to do so. So many of these appeals are frivolous.
Courts need to deter these appeals. Harsh words are oral argument or in an opinion are not enough. It’s time to make defendants start paying for the cost and delay they needlessly add to civil rights litigation.
Case | Date Filed | Date Decided | Days |
---|---|---|---|
Estate of Nash v. Folsom, 2024 WL 504590 (8th Cir. Feb. 9, 2024) | 09/01/22 | 02/09/24 | 526 |
Ellis v. Kirkman, 2024 WL 655667 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, 2024) | 08/04/23 | 02/16/24 | 196 |
Fatai v. Ramos, 2024 WL 863360 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2024) | 03/10/23 | 02/29/24 | 356 |
Anderson-Santos v. Kent County, 2024 WL 862172 (6th Cir. Feb. 29, 2024) | 03/17/23 | 02/29/24 | 349 |
Cook v. Bell, 2024 WL 889041 (11th Cir. Mar. 1, 2024) | 11/21/22 | 03/01/24 | 466 |
Jok v. City of Burlington, 2024 WL 1122561 (2d Cir. Mar. 15, 2024) | 03/01/22 | 03/15/24 | 745 |
White v. Hamilton County, 2024 WL 1257508 (6th Cir. Mar. 25, 2024) | 04/28/23 | 03/25/24 | 332 |
Little v. City of Morristown, 2024 WL 1530468 (6th Cir. Apr. 9, 2024) | 04/10/23 | 04/09/24 | 365 |
Moran v. Greco, 2024 WL 1597624 (2d Cir. Apr. 12, 2024) | 06/15/23 | 04/12/24 | 302 |
Chisesi v. Hunady, 2024 WL 1638587 (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2024) | 05/18/21 | 04/16/24 | 1064 |
Bustillos v. City of Artesia, 2024 WL 1652247 (10th Cir. Apr. 17, 2024) | 04/14/22 | 04/17/24 | 734 |
Cockrun v. Berrien County, 2024 WL 1828305 (6th Cir. Apr. 26, 2024) | 03/29/23 | 04/26/24 | 394 |
Cronick v. Pryor, 2024 WL 1868597 (10th Cir. Apr. 30, 2024) | 07/24/23 | 04/30/24 | 281 |
Patel v. Marino, 2024 WL 1904577 (2d Cir. May 1, 2024) | 04/17/23 | 05/01/24 | 380 |
Kistner v. City of Buffalo, 2024 WL 2525332 (2d Cir. May 24, 2024) | 02/08/23 | 05/24/24 | 471 |
Bevill v. Wheeler, 2024 WL 2762493 (5th Cir. May 30, 2024) | 06/02/23 | 05/30/24 | 363 |
Chambliss v. Brevard County Sheriff’s Office, 2024 WL 2846752 (11th Cir. June 5, 2024) | 09/01/23 | 06/05/24 | 278 |
Singleton v. Casanova, 2024 WL 2891900 (5th Cir. June 10, 2024) | 04/29/22 | 06/10/24 | 773 |
Birch v. Town of New Milford, 2024 WL 3083385 (2d Cir. June 21, 2024) | 08/10/23 | 06/21/24 | 316 |
Martin v. Short, 2024 WL 3200715 (4th Cir. June 27, 2024) | 06/01/23 | 06/27/24 | 392 |
Evans v. Krook, 2024 WL 3283787 (8th Cir. July 3, 2024) | 08/01/23 | 07/03/24 | 337 |
Pope v. Robinson, 2024 WL 3326018 (11th Cir. July 8, 2024) | 07/11/23 | 07/08/24 | 363 |
McClain v. Reynolds, 2024 WL 3423218 (7th Cir. July 16, 2024) | 08/25/23 | 07/16/24 | 326 |
Bell v. City of Southfield, 2024 WL 3429178 (6th Cir. July 16, 2024) | 01/16/24 | 07/16/24 | 182 |
Metcalf v. Cramer, 2024 WL 3466176 (3d Cir. July 18, 2024) | 06/16/23 | 07/18/24 | 398 |
Scott v. Smith, 2024 WL 3574971 (9th Cir. July 30, 2024) | 03/31/23 | 07/30/24 | 487 |
Setchfield v. St. Charles County, 2024 WL 3591695 (8th Cir. July 31, 2024) | 05/18/23 | 07/31/24 | 440 |
Humes v. Jones, 2024 WL 3592189 (8th Cir. July 31, 2024) | 05/16/23 | 07/31/24 | 442 |
Ramsey v. Rivard, 2024 WL 3616826 (6th Cir. Aug. 1, 2024) | 10/24/23 | 08/01/24 | 282 |
Buress v. City of Miami, 2024 WL 3666076 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024) | 09/01/23 | 08/06/24 | 340 |
Davis v. Allen, 2024 WL 3803041 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2024) | 05/02/23 | 08/14/24 | 470 |
Melendez v. Secretary, 2024 WL 3880013 (11th Cir. Aug. 20, 2024) | 08/17/23 | 08/20/24 | 369 |
Brown v. Dickey, 2024 WL 4023245 (1st Cir. Sep. 3, 2024) | 09/21/23 | 09/03/24 | 348 |
Dunn v. Does 1–22, 2024 WL 4050338 (8th Cir. Sep. 5, 2024) | 05/30/23 | 09/05/24 | 464 |
Ambler v. Nissen, 2024 WL 4130099 (5th Cir. Sep. 10, 2024) | 09/26/23 | 09/10/24 | 350 |
Harris v. Tioga County, 2024 WL 4179651 (2d Cir. Sep. 13, 2024) | 04/19/23 | 09/13/24 | 513 |
Sanders v. Newton, 2024 WL 4282907 (8th Cir. Sep. 25, 2024) | 10/19/23 | 09/25/24 | 342 |
Hicks v. Scott, 2024 WL 4360652 (6th Cir. Oct. 1, 2024) | 05/17/23 | 10/01/24 | 503 |
Alfatlawy v. City of Detroit, 2024 WL 4635383 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 2024) | 02/01/24 | 10/31/24 | 273 |
Murdock v. Montgomery County, 2024 WL 4637687 (11th Cir. Oct. 31, 2024) | 10/15/21 | 10/31/24 | 1112 |
Griffin v. Fonda, 2024 WL 4763934 (2d Cir. Nov. 13, 2024) | 08/18/23 | 11/13/24 | 453 |
Clerkley v. Holcomb, 2024 WL 4887389 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024) | 09/13/23 | 11/26/24 | 440 |
Fried v. Garcia, 2024 WL 5040629 (6th Cir. Dec. 9, 2024) | 04/23/24 | 12/09/24 | 230 |
Final Decisions PLLC is an appellate boutique and consultancy that focuses on federal appellate jurisdiction. We partner with lawyers facing appellate-jurisdiction issues, working as consultants or co-counsel to achieve positive outcomes on appeal. Contact us to learn how we can work together.
Learn More ContactRelated Posts
In Fleming v. United States, the Eleventh Circuit became the fifth court of appeals to reject pure Bivens appeals. The court held that federal officials cannot immediately appeal the Bivens question without also appealing the denial of qualified immunity. Unlike some of the prior decisions, this one was unanimous. And it puts the government’s record […]
Continue reading....
In New Albany Main Street Properties v. Watco Companies, LLC, the Sixth Circuit held that it could not review a decision granting leave to amend as part of a qualified-immunity appeal. The leave-to-amend decision was not itself immediately appealable. Nor could it tag along with the denial of immunity (which technically involved qualified immunity under […]
Continue reading....
In Blackwell v. Nocerini, the Sixth Circuit held that a motion to reconsider reset the time to take a qualified-immunity appeal. The denial of immunity was immediately appealable and thus a “judgment” under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So a motion to reconsider that denial was effectively a motion under Federal Rule of Civil […]
Continue reading....
In Asante-Chioke v. Dowdle, the Fifth Circuit reviewed an order refusing to limit the scope of discovery to qualified-immunity issues. The court said that it could immediately review this sort of order via the collateral-order doctrine. But I have my doubts. The Fifth Circuit relied on a line of cases holding that defendants can appeal […]
Continue reading....
The federal government appears to be on a mission to get immediate appeals for orders recognizing a Bivens remedy. So far, those efforts have been unsuccessful. Two courts of appeals—the Third and the Sixth Circuits—have rejected these pure Bivens appeals. In Mohamed v. Jones, the Tenth Circuit became the third. Like the Third and Sixth […]
Continue reading....Recent Posts
The Year in Fact-Based Qualified-Immunity Appeals: 2024 I’ve frequently written about the problem of fact-based qualified-immunity appeals both on this website and in my research. I recently decided to collect some new data on how much needless delay these appeals add to civil-rights litigation. I had done something similar a few years ago when writing […]
Continue reading....
Yesterday, I filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Parrish v. United States, which is currently pending before the Supreme Court. The case asks if an appellant must file a new notice of appeal after the district court reopens the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). Both the […]
Continue reading....
Last month saw another rejection of pure Bivens appeals, an analysis of Perlman appeals in the grand-jury context, and a ruling on mandatory stays during a remand appeal. Plus an odd sovereign-immunity appeal, appeals without the express resolution of all claims, and much more.
Continue reading....
Sometimes a district court doesn’t resolve all the claims in an action. The district court might overlook one of a plaintiff’s many claims. Or the district court might forget about counterclaims or crossclaims. Regardless of what happened, the district court has explicitly resolved only part of an action. If the district court thereafter enters judgment […]
Continue reading....
In City of Martinsville v. Express Scripts, Inc., a divided Fourth Circuit held that a court must stay proceedings—and not process a remand order—if the defendant appeals before the district court can send the remand order to the state court. The majority thought that the rule of Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.—particularly as the […]
Continue reading....